(draft) famfos-sql-fuckery #2

Closed
famfo wants to merge 6 commits from famfos-sql-fuckery into master
Owner

I did something, review pls senpai.

I did something, review pls senpai.
famfo added 3 commits 2022-05-01 14:11:42 -05:00
famfo requested review from lemonsh 2022-05-01 14:11:56 -05:00
karx reviewed 2022-05-01 14:17:07 -05:00
@ -53,0 +68,4 @@
.await?;
return Ok(user.id)
}
Err(anyhow::anyhow!("Username is longer then 16 characters"))
Owner

I think this limit should be enforced in the frontend

I think this limit should be enforced in the frontend
Author
Owner

So why shouldn't this check be here then?

So why shouldn't this check be here then?
Owner

Because it's redundant

Because it's redundant
Author
Owner

I currently don't see a reason to not have it, since it is currenlty not handled on the front end.

I currently don't see a reason to not have it, since it is currenlty not handled on the front end.
Owner

Alright then, change then to than at least

Alright then, change `then` to `than` at least
karx reviewed 2022-05-01 14:18:31 -05:00
@ -21,3 +21,3 @@
<label for="description">Description</label><br>
<textarea rows="3" cols="30" name="description" id="description"></textarea><br>
<textarea rows="3" cols="30" name="description" id="description"><br>
Owner

Why?

Why?
Author
Owner

Because you don't escape textareas

Because you don't escape textareas
Owner

Where is that documented? All the examples on MDN use closing tags

Where is that documented? All the examples on MDN use closing tags
Author
Owner

So I need to remake all textfields I have or what?

So I need to remake all textfields I have or what?
karx marked this conversation as resolved
famfo added 1 commit 2022-05-02 04:18:17 -05:00
famfo added 1 commit 2022-05-02 11:58:51 -05:00
famfo removed review request for lemonsh 2022-05-02 11:59:00 -05:00
famfo changed title from famfos-sql-fuckery to (draft) famfos-sql-fuckery 2022-05-02 12:00:49 -05:00
famfo added 1 commit 2022-05-02 12:03:27 -05:00
Author
Owner

I guess this is a bit useless now with the actix rewrite 🐸

I guess this is a bit useless now with the actix rewrite 🐸
famfo closed this pull request 2022-05-11 04:46:18 -05:00

Pull request closed

Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: C4TG1RL5_UN1T3D/tmtd#2
No description provided.